SRIPLAW associate Alex Cohen is quoted in the Daily Business Review's reporting entitled Photographer Sues Miami Pop Art Gallery Over Vintage Brigitte Bardot Photo. The article discusses a suit filed by SRIPLAW against a Miami artist who has previously been sued for infringing the works of other photographers.
An article on BuzzFeed News entitled Stolen Artwork Is All Over Amazon — And Creators Want The Company To Do Something About It quotes SRIPLAW partner Joel Rothman extensively on issues of infringement and policing of unauthorized use of images.
Kevin Liles, a photographer in Atlanta, is suing Brian Kemp’s campaign and the Georgia Republican Party for their use of images Liles took of Stacey Abrams.
Ring in the new year and ring in the public domain! Click here.
After a twenty year hiatus, tomorrow will finally see the 95 year long copyrights of works released in 1923 expire.
Pohl v. Officite: Are photographs utilitarian and therefore unoriginal or uncreative under § 102?
Photos of Belinda's teeth the Court determined to be unoriginal and uncreative
[T]his Court finds that the photos fall into a class of photographs that federal courts throughout the United States have found to be devoid of creativity or originality.
As a photographer, you know that it takes a lot of work to take that perfect picture. For some of you photography is a way of living, your daily job, and the means for paying your bills.
The Wall Street Journal just published an article entitled Fake Goods on Alibaba Hurt U.S. Small Businesses: Despite Jack Ma’s pledge to champion U.S. small firms, many struggle to get counterfeits removed from Taobao, which landed back on U.S.
VHT, the real estate photo giant, filed suit for copyright infringement against Zillow Group in July 2015 alleging that Zillow had been stealing tens of thousands of VHT’s photos and illegally using them for its own profit and gain on the Zillow Digs website.
The attorneys of Schneider Rothman are admitted to federal courts across the nation. There is hardly a corner of our country that our lawyers cannot cover for our clients.
If you find it on the internet than it must be free. How wrong is that! It's about time that photographers get the respect they deserve and their photographs receive the value that they deserve.
Our firm represents many real estate and architectural photographers. Our experience suggests that the unique challenges facing real estate photographers are not currently being addressed by the different photography associations.
On February 5, 2014, Iran Watson brought a claim against Kappa Map Group, LLC in federal court for copyright infringement for the unlicensed use of one of Watson’s photographs on the cover of an Atlanta Street Atlas published by Kappa.
The National Association of Realtors has made some important revisions to its Handbook on Multiple Listing Policy. These changes clarify NAR's MLS policies to highlight the importance of licensing.
SRIPLAW opened for business in Boca Raton, Florida on January 1, 2013. We started the firm in order to work with clients that we felt had strong claims but could not get quality representation elsewhere.
This is the first in a series of articles discussing the defense of computer code copyright infringement cases. As I write this I am thinking about the many cases filed by serial plaintiff Live Face on Web, LLC also known as LFOW.
Alibaba.com is the world's largest online business to business (B2B) marketplace. If you are a creator, designer, inventor, product marketer, brand builder, or anyone else interested in global commerce or trade in consumer goods, you have probably either purchased from sellers on Alibaba.com,
It seems innocent enough. Your interior designer client has posted one of your beautiful photographs of her latest installation to her Instagram account. The photo highlights your client's design of an expansive living room with vaulted ceiling and massive stone fireplace.
It is well understood that architectural plans are protected by copyright. But what about architectural works "as built?" Does the architect who retains ownership in his or her work have the right to stop others from copying?